Abstract—Socio-technical systems are highly complex in which
a number of domains each of which including numerous interdependent
elements are present. Therefore, for adaptation of sociotechnical
systems, Part 1 of this paper presented a multi-domain
approach based upon Design Structure and Multi-domain matrices
to develop/analyze a multi-domain model of those system.
Moreover, that model is analyzed according to both (1) the change
propagation measures of the non-human domain and (2) the
information processing view of the stakeholder domain of the
socio-technical system. This papers presents application of the
presented method in the Dutch railway system. We have reviewed
the relevant railway literature, and interviewed with a number of
the Dutch railway experts and validated our model. The results
are presented in this paper.
 Bauer, J. M., and P. M. Herder. 2009. Designing socio-technical
systems. In Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences, 601–Elsevier.
 Browning, T. R. 2001. Applying the design structure matrix to system
decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions.
IEEE Transactions on Engineering management 48 (3): 292–306.
 Carayon, P. 2006. Human factors of complex sociotechnical systems.
Applied ergonomics 37 (4): 525–535.
 Danilovic, M., and T. R. Browning. 2007. Managing complex product
development projects with design structure matrices and domain
mapping matrices. International journal of project management 25 (3):
 Doi, T., J. M. Sussman, O. L. de Weck et al. 2016. Interaction of
lifecycle properties in high speed rail systems operation. Master’s thesis,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
 Eckert, C. M., R. Keller, C. Earl, and P. J. Clarkson. 2006. Supporting
change processes in design: Complexity, prediction and reliability.
Reliability Engineering & System Safety 91 (12): 1521–1534.
 Galbraith, J. R. 1974. Organization design: An information processing
view. Interfaces 4 (3): 28–36.
 Geels, F. W. 2004. From sectoral systems of innovation to sociotechnical
systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology
and institutional theory. Research policy 33 (6-7): 897–920.
 Kawakami, S. 2014. Application of a systems-theoretic approach to
risk analysis of high-speed rail project management in the us. Master’s
thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
 Ketchum, and E. Trist. 1992. All teams are not created equal: how
employee empowerment really works. Sage.
 Kurtz, C. F., and D. J. Snowden. 2003. The new dynamics of strategy:
Sense-making in a complex and complicated world. IBM systems
journal 42 (3): 462–483.
 Li, X., and S. E. Madnick. 2015. Understanding the dynamics of
service-oriented architecture implementation. Journal of Management
Information Systems 32 (2): 104–133.
 Luna-Reyes, L. F., J. Zhang, J. Ramon Gil-Garcia, and A. M. Cresswell. Information systems development as emergent socio-technical
change: a practice approach. European Journal of Information Systems
14 (1): 93–105.
 Manz, C. C., and G. L. Stewart. 1997. Attaining flexible stability by
integrating total quality management and socio-technical systems theory.
Organization Science 8 (1): 59–70.
 Perrow, C. 2011. Normal accidents: Living with high risk technologiesupdated
edition. Princeton university press.
 Reiman, T., and P. Oedewald. 2007. Assessment of complex sociotechnical
systems–theoretical issues concerning the use of organizational
culture and organizational core task concepts. Safety Science 45 (7):
 Snowden, D. J., and M. E. Boone. 2007. A leader’s framework for
decision making. Harvard business review 85 (11): 68.
 Spoorwegen, N. 2018, December. NS annual report 2018.
 Williams, T. M. 1999. The need for new paradigms for complex projects.
International journal of project management 17 (5): 269–273.
 Yassine, A. A., R. H. Chidiac, and I. H. Osman. 2013. Simultaneous
optimisation of products, processes, and people in development projects.
Journal of Engineering Design 24 (4): 272–292.